SUBSCRIBE VIA RSS
Taphovenatrix: Dinosaur Taphonomy PhD
  • News and Updates
  • About
  • Research
    • Publications & Outreach
    • Current Research
    • Past Research

New paper: bloat, float, and burial in dead crocs

21/8/2014

2 Comments

 
I've just published my first academic paper in the journal 'Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology', with my co-author Steve Salisbury. Our paper is called "Patterns of aquatic decay and disarticulation in juvenile Indo-Pacific crocodiles (Crocodylus porosus), and implications for the taphonomic interpretation of fossil crocodyliform material." 
What is the paper about?
Essentially, the paper looks at what happens to crocodile carcasses when they rot, undisturbed in fresh water – whether the carcasses float (they do), how long they float for (about a month), whether parts of the body fall off while they float (a few ribs and hip bones do, but not much), and what happens after the carcasses sink (they crumple into a pile of bones, but parts of the skeleton still stay attached to one another). 

We also examined the difference between (1) crocodile carcasses buried in sand, versus (2) carcasses left in water to rot and buried once they sank, versus (3) carcasses left in water to rot and left unburied.

We were interested in how this applies to the fossil record: when we examine fossil crocodiles, can we tell where they died, and how long they were left to rot, and whether they were buried quickly or not?
More details: 'Bloat and float'
Here are some diagrams that show what happened. The carcasses bloated due to bacteria inside the carcass eating soft tissue and creating gases (I'm sure you've all seen swollen or bloated roadkill before, it's the same process). These bloated carcasses float in water, a phenomena (not surprisingly) called 'bloat and float'.
Picture
Side view illustration of carcasses in the experiment bloating, floating, and sinking. Image from Syme et al. (2014).
The carcasses stayed intact while floating (except for a few ribs and hip bones that drifted away thanks to fly maggots eating flesh), and sunk after about 32 days. Large portions of the skeleton stayed intact after sinking, but some portions separated from one another - for example, the whole left leg may have stayed intact, but disconnected from the rest of the body. 
Picture
Top-down photographs of one carcass as it decayed. You can see that while the carcass floated, the limbs, tail, and head stayed connected while slowing sinking below the water's surface. Once they sunk and we very gently drained water from the tank, the carcass looked a lot more disconnected! Image from Syme et al. (2014).
Burial: what difference does it make?
Part of the experiment was to determine the effect of burial on the carcasses. Two crocodile carcasses were buried in sand at the beginning of the experiment, and by the end of the experiment their skeletons looked like this:
Picture
Three crocodile carcasses rotted in fresh water, as I described earlier, but as soon as they sank they were buried in sand. At the end of the experiment, they looked like this:
Picture
And finally, three carcasses were left to rot in fresh water, and after they sunk, they were NOT buried. Here's what their carcasses looked like:
Picture
You can see that the carcasses buried at the beginning of the experiment look pretty much perfect – all the bones are connected and where they're supposed to be. That's not surprising, because the sand surrounding the body stopped anything from moving (there was an added complication as one of those carcasses actually floated up through the sand! But read the paper for more details).

The carcasses buried part-way through the experiment, as well as those not buried at all, look more similar to one another. Chunks of the skeleton stayed together, but other bits separated (disarticulated).
What are the most important conclusions?
The buried carcasses 'survived' the best, and much better than the other carcasses decaying in water. This is a little surprising, because the water was left undisturbed during the entire experiment: there was no water current, no large animals were allowed to scavenge the carcasses, etc. It was purely the action of floating and sinking that caused the bones to separate and move around.

What does this mean for fossil crocodiles? We might think that a really well preserved fossil might have resulted from a carcass being quickly buried, which is a fair assumption. But we might also think that a carcass left to decay undisturbed in fresh water could also be really well preserved and look the same as a buried carcass. The results from this experiment show that this is not the case for modern crocs, and therefore may not be the case for ancient crocs!

References
Syme, C. E., and Salisbury, S. W. 2014. Patterns of aquatic decay and disarticulation in juvenile Indo-Pacific crocodiles (Crocodylus porosus), and implications for the taphonomic interpretation of fossil crocodyliform material. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 412:108-123. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.07.031
2 Comments
david maas link
24/8/2014 06:50:25 pm

Wow. Great post. Thanks for covering this, particularly as the paper is paywalled. The graphics are well done... read very clearly!

Reply
A
6/10/2017 09:09:11 am

Excellent experiment and results, thank you!
This article is a very friendly version of the original :-)

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    About the author

    Dr Caitlin Syme is a palaeontologist studying the taphonomy (preservation state) of fossil non-avian dinosaurs, crocodiles and fish from the Winton Formation, Queensland, Australia. Think forensic science or CSI for fossils, and you're on the right track!

    Posts on this blog focus mainly on vertebrate palaeontology and taphonomy, as well early career researcher (ERC) productivity tips and insights.


    TWEETS

    Tweets by @taphovenatrix

    Search website

    Loading

    Blog topics

    All
    Data Management
    Dinosaur Comics
    Documentary
    Fossil ReadMe
    Funny
    Interesting Research
    News Articles
    Obscure D.o.t.W
    Palaeo Pondering
    Personal
    Ph.D.
    Pseudoscience
    Technology
    T Rex Trying


    Blogroll

    Chinleana
    DinoGoss
    Dinosaurpalaeo
    Dinosaur Tracking
    Love in the Time ofChasmosaurs
    Not Exactly Rocket- Science
    Palaeoblog
    Pharyngula
    PhD Comics
    Phenomena: Laelaps
    Prerogative of Harlots
    Pseudoplocephalus
    SV-POW!
    Tetrapod Zoology
    The Integrative Paleontologists
    The Mammoth Prairie
    The Professor Is In
    UQ Palaeo Blog

    Follow me!

    Academia.edu
    Mendeley
    ResearchGate

    Who's been visiting?


    Archives

    February 2018
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    September 2016
    April 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011


    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.