SUBSCRIBE VIA RSS
Taphovenatrix: Dinosaur Taphonomy PhD
  • News and Updates
  • About
  • Research
    • Publications & Outreach
    • Current Research
    • Past Research

Privileged Barbie in a lab-coat

10/2/2014

2 Comments

 
Picture
Palaeontologist Barbie - or Unattainable Career AND Looks Barbie? Image via Play Stuff Blog.
I read a piece by Hope Jahren on the STEM-ification of Barbie, not so much by Mattel, but by people trying to promote science to girls (by the way, STEM stands for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math). She argues that just putting Barbie in a labcoat is not a measure of the feminist revolution, and that, "I don’t have a little girl, personally, but I vaguely remember being one, and I can’t imagine myself busting Lab Coat Barbie out of my stocking on Christmas morning and thinking, “I want to grow up and be a scientist so I can wear THAT!  Talk about camouflaging one’s waistline … Damn, girl!"

Reflecting on my own childhood, I wondered if owning a Palaeontologist Barbie would have made any difference in my wanting to become a palaeontologist. While I did go nuts for anything palaeontology or dinosaur themed, the obvious answer is no, because here I am researching fossils anyway. The lack of a role model in Barbie didn't change that.
But the answer is also an obvious no, because I grew up privileged. Cis-white-straight. Surrounded by family who never once told me that I couldn't do whatever I wanted to do. Even my school mates (excluding these kindergarten kids), teachers, and other adults never questioned my chosen career. Frankly, they were just as impressed that a 6 year old could pronounce 'palaeontologist'. 

I also had no female palaeontologist role models growing up, and if asked to draw a palaeontologist, I'm sure I would have drawn a white man. But I never linked this to my sense of potential, and nobody else did either. That's the kind of idyllic shelter a privileged life gives.

But when Barbie puts on a lab coat and magically transforms into a scientist, does she become the best women-in-STEM role model?
Picture
Catwalk Model Pink Wearing Lab-coat Barbie. Image via Barbie and Friends Doll Clothes.
A recent experiment looked at the influence of seemingly 'feminine'* role models on middle school girl's perception of their own STEM abilities (summarized nicely in this article, flaws and all). For those who had indicated they were interested in STEM subjects, and then shown pictures of 'feminine' role models, their decisions stayed the same. They were still interested in STEM subjects.

But for those who hadn't made up their minds and were then shown the 'feminine' role model pictures, the results were telling. It seemed that their already potentially shaky sense of self-worth and beauty was compounded by the idea that to be a scientist you had to be smart AND beautiful.

When Barbie is already seen as a terrible role model for beauty and normality, should we spend time dressing her up in a lab coat so she becomes an even more unattainable ideal?

Some might argue that Barbie is the best placed role model for STEM careers, at least to normalise the idea of female scientists. Yes, we do exist. But would the young girls who have non-supportive families (when it comes to career choice) have those very same families buy them a STEM doll? Or is it that, given the choice, many families (who might say they don't think deeply about or have an opinion on sexism and feminism) might buy a STEM doll if it was easily available? Or these girls might be gifted STEM dolls by friends or extended family?

I am curious as to what you all think. Do you remember any female scientists as role-models during your childhood, and did they influence your chosen careers? Did you or have you given your children or grandchildren, male or female, STEM based toys or dolls?

* Where 'feminine' is classed as "wearing pink and saying they were interested in fashion magazines" and neutral is classed as "shown wearing dark colours and glasses and enjoying reading." I'm not sure I'd agree with those categorizations myself...
2 Comments
Amelia
11/2/2014 07:11:47 pm

While I am encouraged that Mattel is taking Barbie out of her comfort zone to investigate 'less feminine' career paths, from the perspective of my younger self these dolls would not have influenced my choices in life. From a very early age I was 100% certain about who I was and what I wanted to do. The only doll I ever wanted and owned was a Disney Pocahontas doll. Admittedly, I would have been excited to see a Barbie doll in palaeontologist gear (minus the hot pink canteen and scarf!). But getting past the novelty it's just a dress up outfit. Lab tech/ science Barbie is also kinda lame (where are her mask, gloves, goggles and hairnet accessories? She will also need to change those shoes to something more lab appropriate!)

I'm not sure how I feel about Barbie as a role model. Growing up, I was influenced by my peers, family, books and TV. I reckon kids develop ideas about beauty mostly from real people and the media, not toys.

When it came to childhood role models I didn't actually pay too much attention to gender. I do remember a distinct lack of popular female role models in science (but not in the field of vet science).

Reply
Caitlin Syme link
10/7/2014 10:52:53 am

Very interesting, thanks for sharing!
I was more interested in the toys of the things themselves (i.e. dinosaurs) and how accurate they were, rather than a toy palaeontologist. I guess I wanted to play-act the role, to 'be' the palaeontologist, not play with a palaeontologist doll play-acting the role! If that makes sense. But I am hyper-aware that this isn't the only way to play.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    About the author

    Dr Caitlin Syme is a palaeontologist studying the taphonomy (preservation state) of fossil non-avian dinosaurs, crocodiles and fish from the Winton Formation, Queensland, Australia. Think forensic science or CSI for fossils, and you're on the right track!

    Posts on this blog focus mainly on vertebrate palaeontology and taphonomy, as well early career researcher (ERC) productivity tips and insights.


    TWEETS

    Tweets by @taphovenatrix

    Search website

    Loading

    Blog topics

    All
    Data Management
    Dinosaur Comics
    Documentary
    Fossil ReadMe
    Funny
    Interesting Research
    News Articles
    Obscure D.o.t.W
    Palaeo Pondering
    Personal
    Ph.D.
    Pseudoscience
    Technology
    T Rex Trying


    Blogroll

    Chinleana
    DinoGoss
    Dinosaurpalaeo
    Dinosaur Tracking
    Love in the Time ofChasmosaurs
    Not Exactly Rocket- Science
    Palaeoblog
    Pharyngula
    PhD Comics
    Phenomena: Laelaps
    Prerogative of Harlots
    Pseudoplocephalus
    SV-POW!
    Tetrapod Zoology
    The Integrative Paleontologists
    The Mammoth Prairie
    The Professor Is In
    UQ Palaeo Blog

    Follow me!

    Academia.edu
    Mendeley
    ResearchGate

    Who's been visiting?


    Archives

    February 2018
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    September 2016
    April 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011


    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.