SUBSCRIBE VIA RSS
Taphovenatrix: Dinosaur Taphonomy PhD
  • News and Updates
  • About
  • Research
    • Publications & Outreach
    • Current Research
    • Past Research

To crush or not to crush?

21/10/2013

1 Comment

 
Picture
That is the geochemical question.

I've collected concretionary rock samples from the fossil locality in central-western Queensland I'm studying, and am now in the process of (partially) destroying them. Why/how/WHAT?

Well, I want to examine the types of minerals in the rocks, including their structure and chemical composition, because we don't know much about the depositional environment under which dinosaur, fish, and crocodile remains were fossilised. Due mainly to the fact that no-one has investigated it yet, but also because there is very little outcrop at the site. Which means I won't be constructing a nice long stratigraphic section, which is normally used to conduct facies analysis, which in turn indicates the likely depositional environment (i.e. deep sea, or river channels, or floodplains and so on). Instead, I'm relying on geochemical indicators of environment.

The analyses I'm undertaking are destructive or partially destructive. Polarised light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and electron microprobe analyses, although non-destructive, require thin sections or small stub samples from sliced-up rock. X-ray diffraction (XRD) requires samples that are crushed into a fine powder. Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) and stable isotope analysis require dissolving the rock in acid which becomes, in the case of ICP-AES, atomized into a mist-like cloud.

These rocks, having survived 101 million years of erosion and a ~1000km car ride back to Brisbane, are now literally dust.

For Science!

But seriously, this is work that absolutely has to be undertaken, to understand how and under what conditions these dinosaur, crocodile, and fish remains became fossilised.

Above photograph: Crushed/powdered rock samples in vials, ready for geochemical testing.
Taken by C. Syme.
1 Comment
Basudev Dutta
10/5/2014 01:55:32 pm

The mineral content & its related structures are better understood by EPMA. So if possible please examine your sample again with EPMA so that you could be better precise with your samples' minerals & structures..

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    About the author

    Dr Caitlin Syme is a palaeontologist studying the taphonomy (preservation state) of fossil non-avian dinosaurs, crocodiles and fish from the Winton Formation, Queensland, Australia. Think forensic science or CSI for fossils, and you're on the right track!

    Posts on this blog focus mainly on vertebrate palaeontology and taphonomy, as well early career researcher (ERC) productivity tips and insights.


    TWEETS

    Tweets by @taphovenatrix

    Search website

    Loading

    Blog topics

    All
    Data Management
    Dinosaur Comics
    Documentary
    Fossil ReadMe
    Funny
    Interesting Research
    News Articles
    Obscure D.o.t.W
    Palaeo Pondering
    Personal
    Ph.D.
    Pseudoscience
    Technology
    T Rex Trying


    Blogroll

    Chinleana
    DinoGoss
    Dinosaurpalaeo
    Dinosaur Tracking
    Love in the Time ofChasmosaurs
    Not Exactly Rocket- Science
    Palaeoblog
    Pharyngula
    PhD Comics
    Phenomena: Laelaps
    Prerogative of Harlots
    Pseudoplocephalus
    SV-POW!
    Tetrapod Zoology
    The Integrative Paleontologists
    The Mammoth Prairie
    The Professor Is In
    UQ Palaeo Blog

    Follow me!

    Academia.edu
    Mendeley
    ResearchGate

    Who's been visiting?


    Archives

    February 2018
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    September 2016
    April 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011


    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.